LPYL -
School
library development
in South Africa and
Sweden


BiS
Home
|
Backgound of
the Library Practice for Young Learners Project
Not long after South Africa’s first general elections as a democracy,
the Education Policy Unit (EPU) at the University of Natal, hosted an
international conference titled ‘School Learners and Libraries’. In
terms of education policy formulation, by the time the conference was held
at the end of November 1995, only the first White Paper for Education
and Training (Department of Education 1995) had been issued by the new
government. There was keen interest and debate about library policy and
what would constitute such policy in a new South Africa. The need for
redress in terms of school libraries was self-evident. In the early 1990s
researchers of the National Education Policy Investigation (National
Education Policy Investigation 1992) conducted a critical situational
analysis of library and information services in South Africa and found
that school libraries were concentrated mostly in urban white, Indian and
coloured schools. Following the publication of its pre-election Policy
Framework for Education and Training (African National Congress 1994),
the African National Congress (ANC) appointed researchers to develop plans
for implementing the policy after the elections. They calculated that the
cost of establishing the traditional Western model of a centralised
library in every one of South Africa’s schools was not tenable. There
were other pressing educational needs that were to be prioritised by the
national Treasury. Thus, alternatives needed to be considered by policy
developers.
It was in this context that the 1995 EPU conference – funded by Sida
– aimed to bring together people from education and library service
sectors to consider alternatives to the traditional Western model of a
centralised school library. At the conference experts presented
international and southern African experience in implementing alternative
models. These were:
- The joint-use library that is operational in Sweden.
- The mobile library that has been implemented in Brazil.
- The integrated curriculum approach introduced in Namibia.
- The regional library service that supports remote schools in
the outback of Australia.
- In South Africa the classroom box library.
- The virtual library, made possible by Internet connectivity,
was found to be useful in many schools internationally, especially in
developed countries.
In response to a conference resolution calling for a redressive school
library policy, the Department of Education initiated a process that led
to the drafting of the National Policy Framework for School Library
Standards. The Policy Framework document was a significant departure
from the past. It sought to be informed by and integrate other policies
such as the outcomes-based education curriculum and governance of schools.
By so doing, it included innovations that had not been tested.
Towards the end of the process of formulating the Policy Framework, the
Library Practice for Young Learners (LPYL) project was initiated.
This project was developed during a period of financial constraints and
cutbacks in the provincial education systems. It was increasingly
recognised that provincial departments were unlikely to allocate more
funds to develop existing school libraries and start new libraries. Thus,
librarians and library managers had to become more resourceful in how they
ran school libraries and provided a service to teachers and learners.
Their own capacity to cope with cutbacks, and develop their ingenuity and
resourcefulness to provide and sustain an excellent and innovative service
despite limited resources was the key. This contextual understanding
focused the LPYL project on human resource development rather than on the
provision of material resources such as computers, books and shelving.
Furthermore, the project was designed to explore some of the untested
innovations in the Policy Framework among a sample of school
librarians in all of South Africa’s nine provinces. The project was also
designed as a North-South collaboration to provide exchanges of knowledge
and expertise between Swedish and South African library personnel. So far
the project has comprised two phases involving South Africa’s national
and provincial education departments and two non-governmental
organisations, and Sweden’s Bibliotek i Samhälle (BIS). For Phase One
the South African nongovernmental organisation was the Library and
Information Workers’ Organisation (LIWO). But when this organisation
ceased to operate, EPU became the South African partner for Phase Two.
Phase One: 1997–1999
Ideas from the School Learners and Libraries conference and the National
Policy Framework for School Libraries formed the important bases for
the strategic direction of this phase. The main targets were school
library policy developers and implementers as well as practitioners at
schools serving disadvantaged communities with few resources and
inadequate infrastructure. The aims embraced for Phase One were to:
- Build a common vision and understanding of the National Policy
Framework for School library Standards among national and
provincial senior managers with a school library responsibility
- Assist in operationalising the Policy Framework at a
provincial level within an outcomes-based education context
- Develop the capacity of teacher-librarians and media advisors to be
innovative in using limited resources
- Facilitate the democratic process of planning and developing school
libraries.
Phase Two: 2000–2001
The Business
plan LPYL, 2000, for Phase Two announced that the phase would exercise the
principles of continuity (for Phase One participants), quality and depth
(of developmental interventions), extension rather than repetition (of
Phase One activities), development and not dependency, reflexivity (on
lessons learnt from Phase One), coherence (with national policy
trajectories), and interdisciplinary co-operation (with public/community
librarians). Based on these principles, the Business Plan developed
strategic objectives and implementation plans, and stipulated the role of
stakeholders in the project. Six strategic objectives were:
- Capacity building and development
- Materials development
- Advocacy
- Study tour exchange programme
- Information and communication technologies
- Case study research
(Extracts from the Introduction in
Nalker. S & Mbokazi. S, Developing Libraries for
South African Learners and Teachers,
Durban: Education Policy Unit
2002)
Back
to LPYL start
Up
|